Translate

Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta fenomenology. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta fenomenology. Mostrar todas las entradas

viernes, 10 de abril de 2026

THE BEARER SUBJECT IN EDWIG CONRAD-MARTIUS' PHENOMENOLOGY

 


The concept of bearer in phenomenological currents is linked to the formation of subjects and subjectivities and is particularly important because it allows us to unravel the complexities of their constitution. However, it is a term that has been little analyzed or used in other philosophical tendencies and, for that very reason, it is unknown. The term Carrier translates the Träger German and the Bearer English. In phenomenology, Edwig Conrad-Martius gives the term bearer a key centrality in his thought, an issue that will be examined in this work. (Seifert & Mbacké Gueye, 2009) (Miron, Hedwig Conrad-Martius: The Phenomenological Gateway to Reality, 2021)

Conrad-Martius's approaches open a space for debate in a context where postmodernity has been hegemonic, especially affecting the understanding of the construction of subjects in the contemporary world. It is possible to rethink subjectivities beyond the affirmations of their dissolution without a romantic return to the subjects of modernity. In addition, there is political responsibility in a world ravaged by the rise of fascism and in which actions of resistance in the public sphere are the order of the day. Although there is no reference or direct relationship, it should be noted that this notion of a bearer is used by Karl Marx in  (Conrad-Martius, Metaphysical Conversations and Phenomenological Essays, 2024) (Hart, 2020)Capital, without the term having been the subject of a solid analysis, despite its importance. (Marx, 1975)

The question of the bearer subject arises in Conrad-Martius in the perspective of the construction of his Realontologie, or the way in which all reality is constituted from itself, with no other foundation than itself. For this reason, he distinguishes within him three moments that underlie the formation of the real: the bearer, the essence and the manifestation of these two, which is, in the final analysis, reality.

Here already is the "fundamental movement" of the realontology: the founding of that which appears in itself from out of itself according to various modalities of selfrootedness. We have, therefore: (1) a substantial” moment (the bearer or object as bearer of predications), (2) an "essential" moment (the what or being-such), and (3) An "existential" moment (the presentation of the object as a union of the substantial and essential moments). (Hart, 2020, pág. 60)

Miron synthesizes the components of the phenomenon of carrying, which lies at the core of the relationship between essence and its expression.

Conrad-Martius' idea of reality assumes a fundamental structure of the real being. This structure is composed of two inseparable constituents: the essence (die Washeit) and the "bearer" (Träger) upon which the essence is "loaded". While the former embodies what she calls the "whatness" of the thing, the latter indicates the content of the real being. She establishes that when the essence constitutes itself, it personally carries a bearer, which is the filling with content of the real being, or alternatively the real is that which carries the essence that belongs to it and specifies it fundamentally. Indeed, the bearer is specified by the essence that is uploaded onto it and by which it exists. At the same time, the essence is carried to the extent that it specifies its bearer. Finally, the function of carrying is based on pure and "formal relations that cannot be destroyed" (1924: 223) to the extent that they should be regarded as "formally pointing out each other" and as "coming into being at the same time" (1924: 172).

(Miron, “Essence” (Wesenheit, Washeit) and “Bearer” (Träger) in Hedwig Conrad-Martius (1888–1966), 2020)

The structure of reality is given by the inseparable relationship between the essence and the bearer. The essence makes a thing what it is, as it is classically defined; but the novelty lies in the appearance of this carrier, which allows the essence to become a concrete reality and to be given as a phenomenon. In this way, the essence charges upon the bearer the actual contents of its being, and the bearer is specified or indexed by the essence. It is understood that the existence of the bearer depends on the essence, without clearly distinguishing the fact of creating the bearer from the process of charging him with certain attributes or characteristics that come from the what is of the essence.

The components that form the structure of reality are affirmed as permanent and universal: essence, carrier, charge, specification; that is, two elements: essence and carrier, and two movements: charge and specification, united by a necessary relationship. With this point by Miron, let us enter into the text of Conrad-Martius, Realontologie, where he develops these ideas extensively.  (Given the difficulty of locating this rather unknown text, I will quote it more extensively than usual.) (Conrad-Martius, Realontologie, 1924)

Conrad-Martius establishes, as a starting point, the ontological status of the bearer, because only when the essence charges the bearer is reality manifested in its specificity, which is the way in which things exist. Real entities are the product of the complete entry of what is of essence into a phenomenon that thus allows it to be and to be effectively. So the fundamental ontological question is to interrogate the essence that is carrying this carrier and that is presented to us in its corporeality.

11. When a truth comes to realization or becomes corporeal, a "bearer" is thus established to whom it is charged as the real content of existence. Or, to put it another way: when a truth is manifested through a carrier constituted in this way, it is the real content of existence and the whole is a real entity. (Conrad-Martius, Realontologie, 1924, pág. 167)

Let us now look at the ontological relationship that is established between essence and bearer, which has a correlate character; that is, the existence of the one implies the existence of the other. The need to define each one in terms of the other is imposed, because separately they lack meaning and existence. In the first place, there is the essence that necessarily manifests itself, and in the second place, the bearer that acquires real consistency or enters into existence, only in so far as it has been charged by its essence.

A real carrier becomes an entity by being charged with an essence; and an essence manifests as such when it corresponds to a factual carrier or a hypokeimenon. The hypokeimenon and the charged essence, or as we may now say, the charged essence, can only define each other and interdependently. One is nothing without the other. (Conrad-Martius, Realontologie, 1924, págs. 169-170)

Care must be taken not to confuse the processual explanation of this phenomenon with thinking that they are two separate moments in time; on the contrary, they are fully simultaneous. The factual carrier is defined by the essence that makes him what he is; and the essence exists only when it manifests itself in the bearer. Neither of the two moments exists before the other. They are the two sides of the same reality, in which the essence provides what is and the factual bearer is put as reality.

Conrad-Martius insists that the bearer is not a reality that exists previously and that comes to meet an essence; this implies an effective process of emergence of the real, which occurs precisely in the permanent conjunction of essence and factual bearer. The essence is charged to the bearer, but, in doing so, it makes the bearer a real entity; thus, the essence enters into the real constituting it.

On this ontological basis, Conrad-Martius advances to the elucidation of the bearer subject as the moment in which the truth of reality is realized as its most prominent point of arrival. The set of elements that have served to describe the relationship between the essence and the factual carrier, which are support, power, representation and charge, now find their expression in the self as a personal instance of truth. The phenomenology that corresponds to the real ontology postulates the existence of this process of constitution of the subject or the self.

To this end, when we speak of the peculiar relation between the real bearer and his own real truth in terms of  support, power, representation, and charge, what is found in these expressions as characteristic for the constitution of reality can also be fixed in a single concept more prominently and now centrally. The real is, through its pure being and being, a positive and personal realizer of its own truth or its own self. (Conrad-Martius, Realontologie, 1924, págs. 173-174)

In this real ontology of Conrad-Martius, the interrelation between essence and bearer leads to the discovery of a constitutive foundation, which is the self, in which reality becomes the practically realized truth. We are squarely on the plane of transcendental idealism in the Husserlian sense of the term, although here the author has passed from the cognitive to the ontological plane because the ego realizes truth not only as pure knowledge, but as a moment of reality itself.

The bearer has gone from being a merely formal subject to a subject in whom truth has been positively "realized" or, as one can also say, has been put into practice. Thus, we bring reality to an underlying constitutive foundation that constitutes it, and with this we have given the empty notion of reality the visual fullness that corresponds to it. The real is that which has been constitutively realized in one's own ego. (Conrad-Martius, Realontologie, 1924, págs. 173-174)

Beyond the debates on this particular phenomenological approach, it is interesting to maintain this central idea of the constitution of subjects and subjectivities, in the sense of carrying subjects who have been charged with an essence, from which they relate to power or represent their own conformation and the world in which they are immersed.

Or, in another way, when we analyze social subjects and people, we have to introduce the question of the burden that they carry, support, represent, and that makes them such subjects, insofar as they are the expression of an essence that is expressed in them. Of course, this is a non-substantialist essence, which is maintained only to the extent that it manifests itself and cannot be considered independently of the factual bearer.

Edwig Conrad-Martius starts from Husserl and, at the same time, distances himself from Husserl in some basic considerations, which would be unacceptable to him. The most important difference is in the ontological turn that he imprints on phenomenology and, later, on the articulation between the emergence of reality from itself and the constitution of the truth of the real in the self. (Breuer, Conrad-Martius: Sein, Wesen, Existenz. In Auseinandersetzung mit der Ontologie und Metaphysik Aristoteles', Thomas von Aquins und Husserls, 2021) (Breuer, Hedwig Conrad-Martius: The real reality of the sensuous appearance vs. the unreality of the artwork, 2023)

From this understanding of the relationship of the essence that burdens the bearer with what he is and turns him into a subject, first formal and then real, we can move towards other situations that are not taken into account by Conrad-Martius, but that have equal relevance. Maintaining the validity of the carrying subject, phenomena related to other modes of load that occur in reality can also be analyzed. I am referring, in a special way, to the situation in which the bearers are already given, whether collectively or individually. This is the most common and everyday fact, and here a new phenomenon arises: what happens when another essence is loaded into a factual carrier subject already given in advance? What series of transformations take place? In what way is the ontological status of the bearer subject altered by the entry of a new essence? Does this phenomenon occur irreversibly or, on the contrary, can it be done and undone over and over again?

It will be necessary to expand, in other studies, the analysis of the essential antagonisms that compete in the structuring of the bearer subjects and the different types of subjects and subjectivities that become real and position themselves as such; or, as Conrad-Martius would say, where a certain truth is realized. This diversity of essences that enter into a carrier subject will be particularly visible in Karl Marx's Capital.

Bibliography

Breuer, I. (2021). Conrad-Martius: Sein, Wesen, Existenz. In Auseinandersetzung mit der Ontologie und Metaphysik Aristotle', Thomas von Aquins und Husserls. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 10(2), 360-397.

Breuer, I. (2023). Hedwig Conrad-Martius: The real reality of the sensuous appearance vs. the unreality of the artwork. NASEP.

Conrad-Martius, H. (1924). Realontologie. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, 6, 159-333.

Conrad-Martius, H. (2024). Metaphysical Conversations and Phenomenological Essays. (C. Gschwandtner, Ed.) Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.

Hart, J. (2020). Hedwig Conrad-Martius' Ontological Phenomenology. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Marx, K. (1975). Capital (Vol. Volume I/Vol.I). Mexico: XXI Century.

Miron, R. (2020). "Essence" (Wesenheit, Washeit) and "Bearer" (Träger) in Hedwig Conrad-Martius (1888–1966). Retrieved from https://hwps.de/ecc/

Miron, R. (2021). Hedwig Conrad-Martius: The Phenomenological Gateway to Reality. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Seifert, J., & Mbacké Gueye, C. (Eds.). (2009). Anthologie der realistischen Phänomenologie. Frankfurt: ontos Verlag.